The Overnightscape 962: The Sure Thing (3/26/13)
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
3:19:02 – Frank on the streets of NYC, plus the Other Side…
(((Description coming))) and the Other Side (at 1:54:33)… Coffee House Rendezvous (Part I) (ca. 1969) [Prelinger, public domain], Coffee House Rendezvous (Part II) (ca. 1969) [Prelinger, public domain], Come Back To Arizona by Polar Lion [Onsug, CC BY-NC-ND 3.0], Banana Bread by Zebra Mussel [Jamendo, CC BY-SA 3.0], Classic TV: 1975 NBC ”Fall Line-Up” Promo Special (1975) (excerpt) [Archive.org], 50 Anniversity [Onsug, CC BY-NC-ND 3.0], Variatio 19 a 1 Clav. [The Open Goldberg Variations, played by by Kimiko Ishizaka, public domain], The Jim Henson Hour – Pitch Tape [YouTube], Kathy Jones [Onsug, CC BY-NC-ND 3.0], Barruada Ga Ga (Instrumental) by Brecule [Jamendo, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0], Repo Man TV Version – Rodriguez Brothers [collection], 1986 Hardee’s Restaurant Training Video – 2/3 [YouTube], Street Time NYC – Track 1 by Randy Antley [collection].
F1912
License for this track: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Attribution: by Frank Edward Nora – more info at TheOvernightscape.com
I am as sure the moon landing was real as you are sure it is not.
Comment by Chad Bowers — March 27, 2013 @ 4:54 am
I am pretty sure the public face of the mission was fake – photos, videos, and movies. In this scenario, Armstrong/Aldrin/Collins would have remained on Earth the whole time.
However, they certainly may have made an attempt to send 3 other guys to the moon. In that sense, the mission may have been real.
The very real danger of the mission failing live on TV would have caused too much damage to America’s image at that time. They couldn’t risk it.
Comment by Frank — March 27, 2013 @ 7:34 am
Ill stay out of the moon landing stuff, aside from repeating that I tend to think it wouldve been more work to fake and had there been the slightest hint it was fake, the USSR wouldve outed it many times. its just not that big a deal to send three guys to the moon. anyhow, im here to agree that ISKON / ‘Krishna Consciousness’ is a very rotten cult that I am happy has been driven from our airports and public spaces.
Comment by PQ Ribber — March 27, 2013 @ 9:28 am
yes it was hard, and risky, but even if we had killed more than one Apollo crew, it would have happened. Us, them, whoever. Landing on the moon was a line in the sand that if we failed to cross it, if the russians failed to cross it, would be accomplished by someone else. Our failures would have only made the others eventual success more meaningful. It was important enough to spend billions of dollars on, to involve 10s of thousands of people and scientists.
Comment by chad bowers — March 27, 2013 @ 12:42 pm
from another website
The first proof that I can offer is this: the only way to keep a secret or pull a hoax is to be the only one involved. If two people know a secret, one of them will eventually tell. There were over 400,000 people involved in the Apollo program from its start to finish. Don’t you think that several of them would have spilled the beans?
Read more: http://www.universetoday.com/84436/was-the-moon-landing-real/#ixzz2OmBVdfkG
Comment by chad bowers — March 27, 2013 @ 1:01 pm
not that any of this could change your mind that other planets even exist or that the earth is not flat. I hope you are just trolling with the stuff, or that in your heart of hearts you just like the idea of these conspiracies more than the hum drum reality of everyday life.
Comment by chad bowers — March 27, 2013 @ 1:04 pm
To quote Grand Moff Tarkin, “You’re far too trusting”
There are several levels here. First, I do not believe that the authorities of this world are trustworthy and reliable enough to be used as as the main source for the way I view reality.
So, in terms of the structure of the Earth, space, and all that – I do not know what the truth is, but I do not completely trust the mainstream explanations. They may be true, but I have some doubt, which I think is warranted.
On the show, I expressed a high degree of personal certainty on only one thing – the public face of Apollo. I do not have the same level of certainty on any of the other issues involved here.
I have personally investigated the photos, videos, movies, audio, etc. of Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17. I am convinced these records of the missions were created on Earth. I am nowhere near as certain about any other aspect of the situation.
As to how and why they did it, again, I do not know.
Comment by Frank — March 27, 2013 @ 1:21 pm
vomit.
Comment by Chad Bowers — March 27, 2013 @ 3:21 pm
I think one the problems you run into with these arguments, is when you start assuming the person who doesnt agree wtih you is naive or “too trusting, or that the person that disagrees with you is in trust and/or agreement with the people who also disagree with you. That type of fallacy is better suited for propaganda than open discussion.
I too, have thought long and hard about these issues and question them all with a open mind. I don’t subrscribe to the idea that the strength of my or anyone elses thoughts about this weigh into the probability of them being correct or not.
When you say that you Do not believe the authorities of this world are trustworty, this implies a view of the “authorities” of this world being some group or at least some type of unified entity. I don’t personally agree with that model.
Comment by chad bowers — March 28, 2013 @ 7:06 am